An article on the Freakonomics blog repudiates the notion that happiness is contagious. While an increase in your friend’s happiness statistically significantly increases your happiness level, Justin Wolfers contends that the cause is the shared emotional experiences and environments that friends share.
There is no good way to differentiate in the data whether an individual’s increase in happiness is due to his friend’s increase in happiness or to some shared external event that increased both your happiness levels (e.g.; your favorite baseball team just won the World Series).
However, now that I think about it, Justin Wolfer’s explanation seems more probable. Amusingly in the same British Medical Journal where the James Fowler and Nicholas Christakis released their happiness is contagious article, Ethan Cohen-Cole and Jason Fletcher setup an experiment which “proved” that height, headaches and acne are contagious in order to prove that silly experimental setups lead to silly conclusions 🙂
Read the article at:
http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/09/is-happiness-contagious/?emc=eta1
It is quite possible that having happy friends are a symtom and not the disease to pervert a phrase.
Let me use thinking in the extreme: Assume someone tells you about a person across the room you do not know. They tell you 1 of their friends is a hit man..or if you are new age lefty open minded 2 hit men. How much do you desire to meet this person?
You can tell by sense of smell that attitudes and events can travel analogously to an electric current. Personally no matter how wonderful a person is if they have undesirable friends its a no go for me.
Another example would be this rhetorical question: Would you date a person who dated a person who later was found by blood test to have AIDs?